INDICATORS ON CASE LAW ON BAIL ON NEW FACTS YOU SHOULD KNOW

Indicators on case law on bail on new facts You Should Know

Indicators on case law on bail on new facts You Should Know

Blog Article

Given that the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be achieved, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the acquired counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession of the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this part for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is established and the employee is found guilty after thanks process of regulation, it's the prerogative on the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the assorted penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed just isn't proportionate with the seriousness in the act of misconduct just isn't sufficient however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion within a structured and lawful method. Read more

Just some years ago, searching for case precedent was a tricky and time consuming job, necessitating people to search through print copies of case regulation, or to buy access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a number of case regulation search prospects, and several sources offer free access to case regulation.

In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced suffered in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children in the home. The boy was placed in an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted around within the foster care system.

The regulation as set up in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.

10. Without touching the merits on the case from the issue of annual increases inside the pensionary emoluments in the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, these kinds of yearly increase, if permissible from the case of employees of KMC, demands further assessment to get made by the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance because of funding issues and check here lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more

Article 27 from the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination on the time of appointment of service but after the appointment likewise. The disparity during the pay scale allowances of Stenographers inside the District Judiciary is while in the crystal clear negation of the regulation laid down via the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. Read more

182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established with the government.

The different roles of case legislation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in how that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale behind their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.

Usually, only an appeal accepted from the court of very last resort will resolve these types of differences and, For numerous reasons, these kinds of appeals are frequently not granted.

Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may possibly request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Report this page